I Weep for this Country

[rayvyn2k]

Literally. I cried myself to sleep last night and my eyes are leaking again today. I don't know what people are thinking. I don't know how they can look at that idiot and see a "leader" of any kind. A draft-dodging drug using party boy who has alway cheated to win. Looks like we're in for four more years of tax breaks for the wealthy and young men dying in the name of...oil.

I just don't understand. All I know is I'm going to encourage my son to marry his fiance as soon as possible. I don't trust the idiot not to reinstate the draft and my child is not going. He has a baby to take care of. I won't give up my child to an unjust war.

Anyway, I'm still shell-shocked. I don't know how I'm going to concentrate at work today. Because I will look at the people around me and wonder--why?

Comments

Re: The Military

[edgedyrksec.livejournal.com]

First of all, I agree with Vorty... The rest of this is for rayvyn2k

Second...
"A draft-dodging drug using party boy"...
Wasn't that Clinton??
And I'd like to mention that Bush didn't DODGE anything, he served in the National Guard... Clinton never served and IS actually a draft-dodger...

Third...
But this isn't about Clinton and Bush or Kerry and Bush...
This isn't even about winning and losing...
It's not about good or evil, blood or oil, war or peace, or even right and left...
It is about right and wrong. Would you rather this baby of yours be blown up in a one of the largest building(s) in the entire country from terrorists thinking they can assault our civilian population unchecked? Would you rather wake up to news that some building your family works in was destroyed with car bombs? Or perhaps killed by a terrorist sniper IN OUR OWN COUNTRY?
I doubt it, but hey...

Fourth...
Saddam = Evil Dictator. End of discussion.

Fifth...
Do not call us morons or idiots. We have firm, rational thoughts about what we say and do, just like you... I do not beget you your right to vote (or even your right to complain, because you voted)... But it's done. We've gloated all we need to thanks to the Gloat Fest from Glenn Beck, and we are back to being reasonable people once more. And with high turn out and high margins for winning, I don't see how you can really point at over half of us and say "You all are idiots" when we got our guy elected. We obviously did SOMETHING intelligent and voted. I would not be complaining -that- much if Kerry got elected, and you shouldn't complain so much about Bush.

Sixth...
WMD's? Korea has a nuke now, should we go to war with them next? That's what you're telling me with that argument...

Seventh...
I don't see YOU out looking for Osama, putting yourself in the path of danger and never knowing when a terrorist is going to car bomb or snipe you. So until you are over there looking, I really think it is unfair to assail our armed forces for not having found him yet.

Eighth...
At least John Kerry did the right thing and let it go, instead of dragging us through recount after recount after recount.

Ninth...
Election is over, results are in, try to live with it. I mean cmon, this is still the greatest country on the face of the Earth. And it is for that reason you should be happy regardless of the results. Rape, murder, and stealing are not going to suddenly become legal because Kerry lost (though that does not mean lawyers may not get people off for them)... There isn't going to be a draft, jeez, how can you even THINK there would be a draft?

Tenth...
Just go about your daily life, stop watching so much TV. Voters have spoken and even if you doubt the intelligence of over half of the United States citizens, they spoke louder and in bigger numbers. If Kerry had won, I'd be writing this to calm MYSELF down, so I hope it helps you too.

Re: The Military

[vortayne.livejournal.com]

Ok, I feel the need to tone down my comment, and will say that war IS a big deal and not to be taken lightly. I cant imagine who would WANT to be over there, although I do have a step brother who came out of inactive duty to activate himself to go over to Iraq for 6 months. He went through some terrible hardships, half of his unit was killed by an attack, while he came back to the U.S. on leave. I know that he thinks about what happened over there on a daily basis and feels the guilt that he couldnt do anything to stop what the terrorists have done. But he believes as I that he would rather fight a war over there than fight it over here.
I just want to make it known to those who have a negative outlook on war and why we are over there, that it IS necessary to keep them from attacking us. Yes, Iraq is a mess, something must be done to correct it. I have full faith in President Bush that he will take the next four years to make changes necessary for the best interests of our country. You have a right to your opinion, but your feelings that we are idiots for putting him back in office was an emotional comment and not one based on common sense. Now that we have radicals such as Daschle out of office, we can start getting things passed to fix the domestic issues in the United States. All I ask is give him a chance to work for you and you will feel better about yourself and your country.

Re: The Military

[rayvyn2k.livejournal.com]

First, we're talking about Bush and Kerry--not Clinton. At least Kerry went over and served in Vietnam. And I don't really think you can call what Bush did "serving".

Second, I DID lose collegues in the attack on the World Trade Center, so how dare you. Our company had a branch office on the 101st floor of Tower One and eleven of our people died that day. Do not attempt to preach to me about loss from a terrorist attack, because I know of such loss first hand.
I have no problem going after the ACTUAL terrorists who attacked our country, or their followers, but there is no evidence that ANY of them were in Iraq. Until after we invaded.

Saddam Hussain was only a threat to his own people. Iraq under Saddam was not an Islamic fundamentalist stronghold. Before 9/11, the official position of the Bush Administration and Congress and the UN was that although the Iraquis were resisting inspections; the restrictions and inspections and sanctions HAD worked and Iraq DID NOT have WMDs. Once we were going after the terrorists in Afganistan, then it was just easier to go after Iraq--so W could go finish what his daddy started. BTW, W's administration includes Dick Cheaney, Colin Powell and Donald Rumsfeld all of whom served under his daddy and had a score to settle with Hussain. It's a bonus that the corporate interests served by Bush are reaping the benefits of the "reconstruction" unilateral invasion. The irony is, during the first Gulf war, we were a part of a coillition of countries who responded to a unilateral invasion of Kuwait.

I would say that because 55 million people voted AGAINST W, that he doesn't have a "concensus". George Bush has NOT been given a mandate. He HAS NOT captured the hearts and minds of ALL of the American public. He THINKS he has, but he is mistaken.

Since this is MY LJ, and I wrote ONE paragraph about my disappointment--I wouldn't call that complaining "so much". And I did not call anyone a "moron" or an "idiot". When I typed my rant, I used an unfortunate turn of phrase "people I thought were intelligent", which I edited out. I should have said, "grossly misled".

The entire reasoning given for going into Iraq in the first place was "they have WMDs." We are not talking about North Korea (who DOES have them), or China (who ALSO does) or even Pakistan (scary thought, isn't it?). All of those countries HAVE WMDs and two out of three of those are run by "brutal dictators". To my way of thinking, it makes as much sense to invade those countries as it did to invade Iraq.

Our armed forces have not found Osama yet, because they are not looking for him. They are too busy dodging the car bombs and snipers in Iraq.

John Kerry condeding shows just how classy he is.

How can I be happy when our civil rights are being slowly eaten away? The so-called "Patriot" Act, gives the government the right to suspend Habeas Corpus if they suspect you of being a terrorist. They can put any type of behavior under the list of "suspect" activities, and then they can tap your phone, search your house, monitor your internet connection...
That may sound like paranoia and conspiracy theory, but that is what the "Patriot" act does. What we are being told to do is "trust the government" they are only looking for terrorist activity. The right-wing "right-minded" high moral standards they pretend to represent (which are outlined by John Ashcroft) enables them to call all kinds of things you have the right to do "suspect behavior". They want you to think like they think. They believe their "morality" is the ONLY morality. For example, civil unions are now against the law.

End of part the first...

Re: The Military

[rayvyn2k.livejournal.com]

Still with me?

As far as "How can I even THINK there would be a draft"--it has already been discussed in Congress, that's how. And that was before the election. Now that Congress has an even larger Republican majority; and since Bush thinks he now has a mandate to do what he sees fit to "fight terrorism"--and since he believes the American people support the war in Iraq--why shouldn't he think that a draft (whatever it may be termed) is an impossibility? What's happened, while it isn't a "true draft", is that service men and women who had finished their "official" obligations have been called back into service. And their terms/tours of duty have been extended. And while it's not "officially" conscription, it is an unfair recycling of our military personnel. These "modifications" to members of the National Guard and Reserve personnel's tours of duty is due to the obvious fact that the military STILL does not have a grasp on the situation in Iraq. When they entered Baghdad, they did not have enough forces to control the situation and to protect the Iraqis from insurgents from other countries who came in to fill the power vacuum. Since then, the military has had forces strung out and endangered to the point where there has been disobedience and "mutiny" that we know of and most probably that we do not know of. When we speak of betrayal, having forces under-manned and under-gunned and under-armored and without a clear plan of resolution---then WHO is betraying WHOM? The military is having trouble recruiting enough people to man their "volunteer" fighting force. If this situation in Iraq continues, there WILL be an excuse for a draft.

I have formed my conclusions and understanding of the situations by checking the facts and not letting any certain political party's ideology and official platform tell me that the media is right or wrong. In the case of the Fox News Network, we see the opposite of the so-called "liberal agenda" in the media. I do not depend on television for the majority of my information. Nor do I depend upon any political party to tell me what to think. The Bush administration expects everyone to just believe everything they say and not to question it. If everyone would just accept everything they say as the truth--everything would be fine. And that is NOT what a democracy is all about.

The real problem with the administration's insistence that Bush has the answer to the terrorist question is: What happens when there is another large-scale terrorist attack that they are incapable of preventing? Their position was that a vote for Kerry was a vote that questioned the security of the United States. The only real effect the Homeland Security measures have had is to keep Aunt Bertha from bringing her knitting needles on a plane. And the subsequent debilitation of the airline industry. And the impact that has had on the economy.

Bush only won by 20 electoral votes and that 55 MILLION voted against him. The American people have spoken and what they've said is: We are not sure.

Our nation is split down the middle about what the so-called "American Agenda" should be. And instead of stepping back and re-examining; the Bush administration and Congress seem to be taking the election results as a seal of approval on the status quo. And that is simply not the case.

I'm not angry about the election results, I'm very disappointed and very, very scared.

And this is all I'm going to say about this subject.

Re: The Military

[edgedyrksec.livejournal.com]

There will be no draft lady. It absolutely will not happen. It would be the most politically suicidal move ANYONE could make today to pass a draft, and I think it would be met with heavy resistance and require martial law to enforce it. The armed forces work far better as a volunteer force than as a drafted force. It always has and always will work better. I'd bet you $100 that there will be no draft in Bush's secord term, and I'll hold up to my end of that bet, how about you?